We were surprised in a community that provides itself as being liberal and supporting liberal causes that we received only two comments on our article entitled "Without Cause". Were all these Liberals merely shouting popular thoughts about fairness? Were all these Liberabls only liberal when it is convenient? The ability to remove a Board Member from the CVCBD Board "W I T H O U T C A U S E" is so anti-democratic that it is offensive to anyone and anyone who has received a popular vote from their neighbors and then had their vote destroyed by the actions of fellow board members. What reason is there to remove someone "without cause"? Is it due to the fact that they don't like the person's religion, political stance, color of skin or where he or she lives? Is it because the person doesn't agree with an issue presented, so rather than debate the issue and attempt to bring the person who opposes the presentation, just remove them "without cause"?
What next? Do we decide that only blond haired people can participate on the Board of the CVCBD? Therefore all black haired people cannot be members of the board. Not only is this undemocratic, it is not the way Charles Villagers thinks and acts. At the hearing all of the newly appointed representatives tn the Board indicated that they do not support the "WITHOUT CAUSE" portion of the bylaws, now it is time for them to demand that this phrase be eliminated from the bylaws. I think that the other members of the Board do not truly understand "without cause" means or they would not have voted to have this phrase incorporated in the bylaws. Ladies and Gentlemen I request that you all stand up and be counted on this position and that the count be printed on the CVCBD web site for all of your neightbors to see.
No comments:
Post a Comment