Regarding the recent hearing of the Charles Village Community Benefits District (CVCBD) on their "Recommended and Alternative Budgets for FY 2013", our community expressed concerns and here is another of the "Other voices from Charles Village", Joan Floyd, Benefits District homeowner:
SUPPLEMENTAL v. DUPLICATIVE SERVICES
THE CONCEPT
When they first authorized the Community Benefits
District special taxing scheme for supplemental services, lawmakers prohibited
the City of Baltimore from withholding regular services from the area where the
special tax is collected and spent. Lawmakers were aware that the City might be
tempted to rely on Benefits District taxpayers to provide their own services.
Lawmakers required the City to sign a Baseline Agreement spelling out what
regular services the City would continue to provide within the special taxing
district.
This mandate, if honored, should protect taxpayers
from having to pay twice for the same municipal services.
For example, let’s say the City puts these items in
the Baseline Agreement: curbside trash pick-up, bulk trash pick-up, street
sweeping, park cleaning, corner can collection and rat abatement. The City would
not be allowed to refuse these services to any block within the special taxing
district. And residents of the area would not want the special tax used to pay
for those services, since the City already provided them.
THE PROBLEM