This is my final entry on "What if there was no Charles Village Community Benefits District (CVCBD)? And, what is it anyway? by Pamela Wilson
Part V - "A better way to run a Community Benefits District – By, of and for the People".
When we moved into Charles Village 13 years ago, long-time residents began telling us about the Charles Village Community Benefits District and their confusion about what it is, what it does, and who runs it. The answer to who runs it is certainly not the community of Greater Charles Village since a community individual who is not affiliated with a legislatively-named organization can only run for and only vote for one voting seat on the CVCBD Board which consists of 18 voting seats from named associations and quad representatives.
As I've said in my earlier blogs on this subject, I and others in the community spent a long time trying to unravel the threads of this governmental entity. What has become apparent to many of us now is that Greater Homewood Community Corporation (GHCC) may well be the force behind the CVCBD and we wonder if its involvement has a lot to do with JHU. Once, GHCC was a true community-run group and one of its first presidents, upon receipt of a check to GHCC from Johns Hopkins University (JHU) to support one of JHU's initiatives, returned it back to the JHU president because the initiative was not of benefit to the community. Somewhere down the line something changed and we now hear GHCC called a "development corporation". Since inception GHCC has grown to cover a huge area that GHCC claims encompasses 45 neighborhoods and almost 13% of Baltimore City 's population. This makes GHCC another layer of non-elected control over communities, beyond that of our elected City officials, special benefits districts, other committees and initiatives, and local community and business associations. We wonder if GHCC any longer serves only community interests as it once did or if it now serves some larger power as it spreads throughout North Central Baltimore? Contrary to how GHCC began in 1969, GHCC's Board of Directors now includes at least two members from Hopkins, Inc.. Does GHCC's heavy influence over the community organizations which agree to "partner" or connect to GHCC point to the day when GHCC will be the sole voice of the residential and commercial neighborhoods impacted by JHU's present and future plans? And how does this relate to the CVCBD and its lack of democratically elected Board members?